Submitted by Henry, who says:

Here🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页s a simple diagram for a hypothetical Seattle where Forward Thrust🔸澳洲幸运10预测 (the original 🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页60s subway) was actually built and where we would be today. If only we really had this level of transit.

I tried to make this kind of look like a diagram you might find in a newspaper, so it🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页s not super detailed with a legend and stuff. Or at least that🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页s my excuse for being lazy!

澳洲10开官网开奖🔸澳洲幸运10预测 says:

A nice “what if?” map here from Henry, envisioning a Seattle where construction on a light rail network began in the 1960s instead of later… much🔸澳洲幸运10预测 later. It🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页s the little touches that I like, like the latest work package being called Forward Thrust 3🔸澳洲幸运10预测 (or FT3) instead of the real world Sound Transit 3🔸澳洲幸运10预测/ST3. It seems that in this alternate world, Sound Transit was never formed, as Henry places the ownership of the network with King County Metro.

The diagram itself does have that “newspaper infographic” feel, so I🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页d say it works as Henry intended. While simplification is good for that purpose, I🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页d still like to see a version with the bodies of water that do so much to define Seattle – Lake Union, Lake Washington and the Puget Sound itself. The reason this network looks so similar to the planned ST3 configuration of the real world is simply because Seattle is hemmed in by water and there🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页s very few viable routes.

AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页 little technical thing I🔸AB开奖网澳洲幸运10官网网页d like to see fixed is the divergence of the red and blue lines south of Jackson station: if Henry nudged the change of direction on the red line down and to the right a bit more, the lines would change direction at the same point, which always looks a bit cleaner to me.

🔸澳洲幸运10冠军定位计划final word: 🔸澳洲幸运10预测A simple diagram of what could have been, made with a minimum of fuss. Works for me!